Similarly, minimal group effects can also contribute to a positive sense of ingroup identity hogg and adams, 1988. Participants high both in the need for cognitive structure and the ability to achieve cognitive structure relied most heavily on the self as a. This paper seeks to discuss minimal group paradigm in. These results demonstrate that for surfers, the internet experience is very real and even a trivial allocation of people to a group is likely to create a situation of ingroup favoritism. Previous research has suggested that children do not show sensitivity to minimal cues to group membership until the age of five to six, contributing to claims that this is an important transition in the development of intergroup cognition and behavior. Tajfel and turners 1979, 1986 social identity theory, the minimal group paradigm with which the theory is associated and two core findings stemming from that paradigm are. Read consequences of minimal group affiliations in children, child development on deepdyve, the largest online rental service for scholarly research with thousands of academic publications available at your fingertips. Although not a criticism of the minimal group paradigm, mummendey et al 1992 have challenged its position and believe that a positivenegative asymmetry exists in the effects. The relationship of adult attachment patterns and intergroup bias, using minimal groups. Trivial and important criteria for social categorization. The minimal group paradigm and the tajfel matrices. The minimal group paradigm in virtual teams springerlink.
Two experiments examined whether discrimination in the mgp arises from categorization or processes of outcome dependence, that is, ingroup reciprocity and outgroup fear. One of the most influential paradigms in research on intergroup relations is the minimal group paradigm. Insko university of north carolina at chape l hil h. For example, the classic procedure involves asking participants to rate paintings made by two artists. However, explanation of the finding is controversial. Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following locations. Research on empathy for pain has provided evidence of an empathic bias toward racial ingroup members. Tajfel 1970 by hauwa and christina aim background find out if intergroup discrimination would take place when people are put in different groups with categorization into ingroups and outgroups in a situation where they had just met social identity theory.
When shared group membership signifies shared subjective. He wanted to observe the minimal conditions required to induce prejudice. In this study, we investigated whether a minimal group paradigm assigning individuals to arbitrary group categories is powerful enough to induce changes in behavioural, psychophysiological and eventrelated potential correlates of performance monitoring. The variables in these studies have been derived from conflict, competition, cooperation, personal interaction, structures, personalities, etc. The impact of need and ability to achieve cognitive structure show all authors. In this minimal group paradigm, we found that outgroup exemplars were more readily associated with an aversive stimulus than exemplars of ones in. In line with previous studies exploring the impact of resource inequalities on egalitarian and discriminatory behaviors between groups e. Ingroup bias in the minimal group paradigm shown by three.
Pdf raising the minimum in the minimal group paradigm. Based on this premise, we investigated whether ingroup favouritism within the minimal group paradigm is. Amichaihamburger 2005 demonstrates that this result, originally obtained in facetoface settings, also occurs in the online environment. Wikiproject psychology rated startclass this article is within the scope of wikiproject psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of psychology on wikipedia. Intergroup discrimination in the minimal group paradigm. A metaanalysis emily pechar1 rachel kranton2 august 17 2017 abstract. The minimal group paradigm mgp has been used as a method to demonstrate intergroup discrimination between arbitrary groups for the past 45 years. We investigate young childrens sensitivity to minimal group membership.
Experiments that employ the minimal group paradigm show that. The effects of inter and intragroup interdependence. A read is counted each time someone views a publication summary such as the title, abstract, and list of authors, clicks on a figure, or views or downloads the fulltext. The minimal group paradigm tajfel, billig, bundy and flament, 1971 has been influential in the study of intergroup relations. Performance monitoring during a minimal group manipulation. Like any good experimentalist, tajfel sought a flexible procedure within which to manipulate features thought to relate to the formation of intergroup bias. Yet many of the grouping schemes used in minimal group research may imply something significant. It emerges even in the minimal group paradigm, where participants are assigned to novel groups based on seemingly insignificant characteristics. In order to do this he created a paradigm that removed all the possible factors that accentuate intergroup bias, so all that was left was mere categorisation of ingroup and outgroup. The relationship of attachment patterns and intergroup.
Investigating the evolution of ingroup favoritism using a. Fear is readily associated with an outgroup face in a. Free fulltext pdf articles from hundreds of disciplines, all in one place. The minimal group paradigm is a methodology employed in social psychology.
Trivial and important criteria for social categorization in the minimal group paradigm. Thus far, most minimal group experiments have divided the subjects either into two groups, or have categorized them on two separate dichotomous. Bilateral dependency and the minimal group paradigm. Fear is readily associated with an outgroup face in a minimal group context. How much of the power of human social groups stems from learned variation versus abstract commonality.
Minimal group paradigm is a social psychology research methodology that proposes that the minimal condition for group biases like favoritism towards your own group and prejudice towards other groups is simply being a member of a group. In bilateral dependency condition, each member made allocation decisions for ingroup as well as outgroup participants. Intergroup discrimination and selfesteem in the minimal. Pdf docs ebook the paradigm by jonathan cahn download full. In this paper we transfer this socalled minimal group paradigm mgp to online collaboration. Alternative explanations of the mgp discrimination effect. Psychological and sociostructural correlates of allocation strategies. Minimal group paradigm definition psychology glossary. However, henri tajfel, in 1971 conducted an extensive research referred to as minimal group paradigm which was aimed at identifying bias and bias based on ingroup. Our experiments confirm the value of studying the evolution of minimal group behavior, especially for explaining why. Minimal group research began when henri tajfel sought to develop a basic paradigm within which to study the origins of intergroup bias tajfel, 19712001.
Moderators of intergroup discrimination in the minimal. Although immensely varied, all social groups can be considered specific instantiations of a common and abstract ingroupoutgroup structure. Thus far, most minimal group experiments have divided the subjects either into two groups, or have categorized them on two separate dichotomous dimensions in cross. Social psychology chapter 11 stereotyping, prejudice. Categorization into two versus three groups, european journal of social psychology on deepdyve, the largest online rental service for scholarly research with thousands of academic publications available at your fingertips.
Students receive a handout with matrices listing different values that their side of the auditorium the ingroup would receive and that the other side the outgroup would receive. Human social groups are central to social organization and pervasively impact interpersonal interactions. Smith university of british columbia, vancouver, canada this experiment was designed to test the hypothesis that intergroup discrimination in the minimal group paradigm is related to selfesteem. Investigating the evolution of ingroup favoritism using a minimal group interaction paradigm. It was found that group members perceived their own group performance as superior on a cognitive task as compared with that of the other group. The goal is to categorize individuals into groups based on minimal criteria that are relatively trivial or arbitrary. View or download all content the institution has subscribed to.
Two empirical studies with a total of n190 participants were conducted to replicate the minimal group paradigm in different virtual settings informal vs. Consequences of minimal group affiliations in children. Minimal group paradigm studies experiments henri tajfel. Intergroup behavior has long been studied within and among various societies. The minimal group paradigm and its maximal impact in. Minimal group paradigm 2 introduction intergroup conflict involves not only disagreement and conflict between members of different groups but also physiological tension. The reliable finding in this minimal situation consists of intergroup discrimination. Minimal group paradigm definition the minimal group paradigm is a procedure that researchers use to create new social groups in the laboratory. It was exactly the same situation used in the original studies under the minimal group paradigm, and the subjects knew that their reward allocation too depended on others decisions. The minimal group paradigm and its minimal psychology. Although it may be used for a variety of purposes, it is most well known as a method for investigating the minimal conditions required for discrimination to occur between groups. Frontiers behavioral investigation of the influence of. Social identity theory attempts to explain such intergroup discrimination in the real world as well as in the context of the minimal group paradigm. Initially motivated by an interest in understanding the basic determinants of social discrimination, this paradigm investigates the impact of social categorization on intergroup relations in the absence of realistic conflicts of interests, and for social categories that are arbitrary and novel.
811 684 971 1185 1123 88 1008 114 1074 20 476 963 1169 94 1061 138 680 550 905 1311 1421 972 698 1137 749 1378 507 538 647 768 936